Practical guidelines for independent assessment in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rehabilitation
- 1 November 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Clinical Rehabilitation
- Vol. 11 (4) , 273-279
- https://doi.org/10.1177/026921559701100402
Abstract
Objective: To provide guidelines for conducting independent assessments in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rehabilitation. The article aims to assist those who plan to put independent assessment into practice and to be an introduction for those who are new to independent assessment. Issues: Possible causes of unblinding to group allocation are discussed, such as unblinding by other people, the environment, patients and assessors themselves. Other issues discussed in this paper are bias during assessment and monitoring levels of unblinding. Conclusion: The importance of monitoring levels of unblinding is stressed. Although it may not be possible to always keep an assessor blind in RCTs of rehabilitation, we should strive for perfection. It is therefore advocated that levels of unblinding should be reported.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Empirical Evidence of BiasJAMA, 1995
- Writing a Research ArticleBritish Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1994
- Design a questionnaire.BMJ, 1993
- … Design a Questionnaire — A Ten-stage StrategyPublished by Elsevier ,1993
- BiasThe Lancet, 1993
- SurveysClinical Rehabilitation, 1990
- Single-case experiments in neurological rehabilitationClinical Rehabilitation, 1990
- Case-control studies in rehabilitationClinical Rehabilitation, 1990
- Research methodologyClinical Rehabilitation, 1990
- Bias in Treatment Assignment in Controlled Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983