Analysis of mouse EphA knockins and knockouts suggests that retinal axons programme target cells to form ordered retinotopic maps
Open Access
- 15 July 2006
- journal article
- Published by The Company of Biologists in Development
- Vol. 133 (14) , 2705-2717
- https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.02430
Abstract
I present a novel analysis of abnormal retinocollicular maps in mice in which the distribution of EphA receptors over the retina has been modified by knockin and/or knockout of these receptor types. My analysis shows that in all these cases, whereas the maps themselves are discontinuous, the graded distribution of EphA over the nasotemporal axis of the retina is recreated within the pattern of axonal terminations across rostrocaudal colliculus. This suggests that the guiding principle behind the formation of ordered maps of nerve connections between vertebrate retina and superior colliculus, or optic tectum, is that axons carrying similar amounts of Eph receptor terminate near to one another on the target structure. I show how the previously proposed marker induction model embodies this principle and predicts these results. I then describe a new version of the model in which the properties of the markers, or labels, are based on those of the Eph receptors and their associated ligands, the ephrins. I present new simulation results, showing the development of maps between two-dimensional structures, exploring the role of counter-gradients of labels across the target and confirming that the model reproduces the retinocollicular maps found in EphA knockin/knockout mice. I predict that abnormal distributions of label within the retina lead to abnormal distributions of label over the target, so that in each of the types of knockin/knockout mice analysed, there will be a different distribution of labels over the target structure. This mechanism could be responsible for the flexibility with which neurons reorganise their connections during development and the degree of precision in the final map. Activity-based mechanisms would play a role only at a later stage of development to remove the overlap between individual retinal projection fields, such as in the development of patterns of ocular dominance stripes.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- A relative signalling model for the formation of a topographic neural mapNature, 2004
- Insights into activity‐dependent map formation from the retinotectal system: A middle‐of‐the‐brain perspectiveJournal of Neurobiology, 2004
- Computational modeling of retinotopic map development to define contributions of EphA‐ephrinA gradients, axon‐axon interactions, and patterned activityJournal of Neurobiology, 2004
- Persistence of graded EphA/Ephrin-A expression in the adult frog visual systemJournal of Comparative Neurology, 2003
- Topographic Mapping from the Retina to the Midbrain Is Controlled by Relative but Not Absolute Levels of EphA Receptor SignalingCell, 2000
- Topographic Mapping in the Retinotectal Projection by Means of Complementary Ligand and Receptor Gradients: a Computer Simulation StudyJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1998
- THE EPHRINS AND EPH RECEPTORS IN NEURAL DEVELOPMENTAnnual Review of Neuroscience, 1998
- Compound eyes project stripes on the optic tectum in XenopusNature, 1982
- The Visual System and “Neuronal Specificity”Nature, 1972
- The retinal projections in the goldfish: An experimental studyBrain Research, 1972