Evaluation of different ovarian stimulation protocols forin vitrofertilization
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Gynecological Endocrinology
- Vol. 9 (2) , 103-112
- https://doi.org/10.3109/09513599509160198
Abstract
In this study we evaluated retrospectively the efficacy of five different ovarian stimulation protocols in an in vitro fertilization program, in which 512 women were involved. Ovulation was induced by the following protocols: group I (271 cycles): buserelin short protocol (1 mg/day, intranasally) with human menopausal gonadotropin/human chorionic gonadotropin (hMG/hCG); group II (45 cycles): buserelin (short protocol) with pure follicle stimulating hormone (p-FSH)/hMG/hCG; group III (24 cycles): clomiphene citrate (100 mg/day) with hMG/hCG; group IV (122 cycles): hMG (3 ampules/day) and hCG; group V (113 cycles): hMG/hCG and prednisolone (7.5 mg/day) after cycle programming with oral contraceptives. The lowest cancellation rate (3.3%) was noted in group I, followed by group V (9.7%). The highest number of follicles was observed in groups I (8.3 +/- 0.3; mean +/- SEM) and V (7.8 +/- 0.5). Also, more oocytes were retrieved in group I (7.2 +/- 0.3, p < 0.001), which were of good quality based on oocyte maturity as well as on the fertilization rate, and more embryos (4.5 +/- 0.3, p < 0.05) were developed. The correlation between estradiol and the total follicular volume on the day of hCG administration was also examined in the five groups. The best correlation (r = 0.6502) was found in group I, followed by group V (r = 0.5810). Significant differences were observed in the five groups with regard to the number of hMG ampules administered (p < 0.0001, F = 15.393) and the stimulation days (p < 0.0001, F = 35.32). Sixty-six clinical pregnancies were achieved: 37 (17.5%) in group I, seven (25.9%) in group II, one (10%) in group III, ten (15.6%) in group IV and 11 (15.5%) in group V (differences were not statistically significant). In conclusion, all five protocols were satisfactory in ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization, and gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs seemed to be more advantageous by reducing the cancellation rate, enhancing the number of oocytes retrieved and embryos developed and by improving the pregnancy rates.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Programmed oocyte retrieval: Clinical and biological effects of oral contraceptives administered before in vitro fertilizationGynecological Endocrinology, 1989
- Use of GnRH analogues in ovulation induction for in vitro fertilization: Benefit of a short administration regimenJournal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 1987
- In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: The legal status in EuropeJournal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 1986
- EFFECT OF HIGH TONIC LEVELS OF LUTEINISING HORMONE ON OUTCOME OF IN-VITRO FERTILISATIONThe Lancet, 1986
- Reduced in‐vitro fertilization of human oocytes from patients with raised basal luteinizing hormone levels during the follicular phaseBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1985
- The use of ovarian ultrasonography in monitoring ovulation inductionJournal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 1984
- In Vitro Fertilization: State of the ArtSeminars in Reproductive Medicine, 1984
- A Study of Factors Affecting the Success of Human Fertilization in Vitro. I. Influence of Ovarian Stimulation Upon the Number and Condition of Oocytes CollectedBiology of Reproduction, 1983
- Pregnancies in Humans by Fertilization in Vitro and Embryo Transfer in the Controlled Ovulatory CycleScience, 1981
- BIRTH AFTER THE REIMPLANTATION OF A HUMAN EMBRYOThe Lancet, 1978