Assessing the ‘value for money’ from rehabilitation programmes
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Physiotherapy Practice
- Vol. 4 (1) , 30-40
- https://doi.org/10.3109/09593988809161440
Abstract
In most countries the resources for the provision of health care are increasingly stretched in the face of competing demands for their use. This has stimulated interest in methods of assessing the ‘value for money’ from health service investments. In the past those providing rehabilitation services have often been at the end of the queue for health service resources and there is a danger that they will also be left behind in the race to demonstrate ‘value for money’ from their programmes. This paper outlines the methods of economic evaluation in health care, critically reviews their application to rehabilitation programmes to date and discusses how economic analysis could be conducted alongside a clinical trial of an active rehabilitation programme for stroke patients. It is argued that, despite the methodological difficulties, there ought to be more economic evaluations of rehabilitation programmes in the future.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Economic analysis and clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1984
- Some issues in the clinical, social and economic evaluation of new nursing servicesJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1983
- Cost of counselling women who undergo mastectomy.BMJ, 1982
- Cost-effectiveness study of outpatient physiotherapy after medial meniscectomy.BMJ, 1982
- Health-related quality of life measurement for evaluation research and policy analysis.Health Psychology, 1982
- COSTING NEW SERVICES: LONG-TERM DOMICILIARY OXYGEN THERAPYThe Lancet, 1981
- Stroke rehabilitation. Outcome studies and guidelines for alternative levels of care.Stroke, 1981
- Day Hospitals in Modern Clinical Practice--Cost BenefitAge and Ageing, 1979
- The Economic Cost of Illness Fiscal 1975Medical Care, 1978
- Comparison of Care and Cost Outcomes for Stroke Patients With and Without Home CareStroke, 1974