The future of outcomes measurement: item banking, tailored short-forms, and computerized adaptive assessment
Top Cited Papers
- 31 March 2007
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Quality of Life Research
- Vol. 16 (S1) , 133-141
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9204-6
Abstract
The use of item banks and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) begins with clear definitions of important outcomes, and references those definitions to specific questions gathered into large and well-studied pools, or “banks” of items. Items can be selected from the bank to form customized short scales, or can be administered in a sequence and length determined by a computer programmed for precision and clinical relevance. Although far from perfect, such item banks can form a common definition and understanding of human symptoms and functional problems such as fatigue, pain, depression, mobility, social function, sensory function, and many other health concepts that we can only measure by asking people directly. The support of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), as witnessed by its cooperative agreement with measurement experts through the NIH Roadmap Initiative known as PROMIS (www.nihpromis.org), is a big step in that direction. Our approach to item banking and CAT is practical; as focused on application as it is on science or theory. From a practical perspective, we frequently must decide whether to re-write and retest an item, add more items to fill gaps (often at the ceiling of the measure), re-test a bank after some modifications, or split up a bank into units that are more unidimensional, yet less clinically relevant or complete. These decisions are not easy, and yet they are rarely unforgiving. We encourage people to build practical tools that are capable of producing multiple short form measures and CAT administrations from common banks, and to further our understanding of these banks with various clinical populations and ages, so that with time the scores that emerge from these many activities begin to have not only a common metric and range, but a shared meaning and understanding across users. In this paper, we provide an overview of item banking and CAT, discuss our approach to item banking and its byproducts, describe testing options, discuss an example of CAT for fatigue, and discuss models for long term sustainability of an entity such as PROMIS. Some barriers to success include limitations in the methods themselves, controversies and disagreements across approaches, and end-user reluctance to move away from the familiar.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Anorexia/cachexia‐related quality of life for children with cancerCancer, 2005
- An Item Response Theory-Based Pain Item Bank Can Enhance Measurement PrecisionJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2005
- An item bank was created to improve the measurement of cancer-related fatigueJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2005
- Measuring Quality of Life in Routine Oncology Practice Improves Communication and Patient Well-Being: A Randomized Controlled TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Issues in the development of an item bankArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2003
- Measuring quality of life: Using quality of life measures in the clinical settingBMJ, 2001
- Equating Health Status Measures With Item Response TheoryMedical Care, 2000
- Event management and analysis for WindowsComputer Fraud & Security, 2000
- Computer administration of questions: More desirable or more social desirability?Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990
- Adaptive Testing: The Evolution of a Good IdeaEducational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1989