The age of the earth controversy: Beginnings to Hutton
- 1 July 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Annals of Science
- Vol. 38 (4) , 435-456
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00033798100200311
Abstract
Speculation concerning the age of the earth begins with civilisation itself. The creation myths of ancient Egypt and other early cultures were soon expanded into elaborate cosmologies by Indian, Persian and Greek philosophers. Jewish and, more insistently, Christian scholars long believed that the Bible provided an exact chronology beginning with the Creation (and even foretelling the world's end). Such truncated apocalyptic chronologies were opposed first by Aristotelian advocates of an eternal earth and then by deistic freethinkers who regarded the earth's age as indefinite but immense. As textual scholarship cast doubt upon the literal reliability of Genesis, alternative chronologies arose which depended increasingly upon geological evidence. James Hutton's assertions about the earth's age reflect his awareness of this broader context and define his own important contribution to it.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The History of Scepticism from Erasmus to SpinozaPublished by University of California Press ,1979
- James Hutton on Religion and Geology: the unpublished preface to his Theory of the Earth (1788)Annals of Science, 1975
- Dietary potassium and diuretic therapyAmerican Heart Journal, 1974
- The myth of heavenly leisurePublished by Elsevier ,1974
- James Hutton and his public, 1785–1802Annals of Science, 1973
- Renaissance Estimates of the Year of CreationHuntington Library Quarterly, 1963