Grading and Rotational Crossbreeding of Beef Cattle. I. Reproductive Performance1

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Purebred Angus (A), Polled Hereford (PH) and Santa Gertrudis (SG) bulls were mated to grades, two-breed and three-breed rotational crosses of these breeds (seven herds) to produce three generations (Gl, G2 and G3) of calves. The grade A and PH cows were higher in A and PH breeding, respectively, than grade SG cows were in SG breeding. Reproductive performance among grade and rotational-cross herds was evaluated for herd differences, heterosis and effects of various genetic components. For cows that produced Gl calves; the proportion of cows that calved, had a live calf and weaned a calf was higher (P<.01) for those that calved compared with those that failed to calve the previous year. For cows that produced G2 and G3 calves, previous year's calving status did not affect (P>.05) reproductive performance. Grade A and PH were similar (P>.05) in reproductive performance during Gl, G2 and G3. As generations advanced, SG decreased in reproductive performance. Except for the PH-SG rotational cross in G3, the A, PH and all two-breed rotational crosses and the three-breed rotational cross generally were similar (P>.05) for the three reproductive traits during each generation. Within generations, reproductive performance was similar (P>.05) between rotations within each of the two-breed rotational cross herds. For the -three-breed rotational cross herd, differences due to rotation generally were not significant during Gl and G2, but for G3, the SG sires were associated with lower (P<.05) reproductive performance for each of the three reproductive traits compared with A and PH sires. Heterosis percentages generally were positive but not significant for each of the three reproductive traits. On the basis of additive and maternal effects of A and SG expressed as deviations from PH, the only genetic component that significantly affected reproductive performance was the detrimental additive effect of SG in G2 and G3 for each of the three reproductive traits. Also, there was a consistent negative relationship between breed additive and maternal components for each of the three reproductive traits during each generation. Only 4 to 7% of the variation in reproductive performance was accounted for in the analyses that included breed additive, breed maternal, heterosis and average maternal heterosis effects. Averaged over generations, from .1 to .4% additional variation was due to factors that may have included specific maternal heterosis, epistasis and linkage. Copyright © 1984. American Society of Animal Science . Copyright 1984 by American Society of Animal Science.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: