Retinotopic order in the absence of axon competition
- 26 March 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature
- Vol. 452 (7189) , 892-895
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06816
Abstract
Use of transplantation to create mosaic zebrafish in which only one retinal ganglion cell develops in the eye enables the projection of this axon that innervates the tectum to be observed. It is found that these axons still navigate to their topographically correct target. The experiment rules out competition as essential for topographic specificity in the zebrafish. The retinotectal projection has long been studied experimentally and theoretically, as a model for the formation of topographic brain maps1,2,3. Neighbouring retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) project their axons to neighbouring positions in the optic tectum, thus re-establishing a continuous neural representation of visual space. Mapping along this axis requires chemorepellent signalling from tectal cells, expressing ephrin-A ligands, to retinal growth cones, expressing EphA receptors4. High concentrations of ephrin A, increasing from anterior to posterior, prevent temporal axons from invading the posterior tectum. However, the force that drives nasal axons to extend past the anterior tectum and terminate in posterior regions remains to be identified. We tested whether axon–axon interactions, such as competition, are required for posterior tectum innervation. By transplanting blastomeres from a wild-type (WT) zebrafish into a lakritz (lak) mutant, which lacks all RGCs5, we created chimaeras with eyes that contained single RGCs. These solitary RGCs often extended axons into the tectum, where they branched to form a terminal arbor. Here we show that the distal tips of these arbors were positioned at retinotopically appropriate positions, ruling out an essential role for competition in innervation of the ephrin-A-rich posterior tectum. However, solitary arbors were larger and more complex than under normal, crowded conditions, owing to a lack of pruning of proximal branches during refinement of the retinotectal projection. We conclude that dense innervation is not required for targeting of retinal axons within the zebrafish tectum but serves to restrict arbor size and shape.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Contributions of Theoretical Modeling to the Understanding of Neural Map DevelopmentNeuron, 2007
- Vesicular Glutamate Transport at a Central Synapse Limits the Acuity of Visual Perception in ZebrafishNeuron, 2007
- Analysis of mouse EphA knockins and knockouts suggests that retinal axons programme target cells to form ordered retinotopic mapsDevelopment, 2006
- Silencing of EphA3 through a cis interaction with ephrinA5Nature Neuroscience, 2006
- Neural map specification by gradientsCurrent Opinion in Neurobiology, 2006
- Staggered cell-intrinsic timing ofath5expression underlies the wave of ganglion cell neurogenesis in the zebrafish retinaDevelopment, 2005
- A relative signalling model for the formation of a topographic neural mapNature, 2004
- Retinal Axon Response to Ephrin-As Shows a Graded, Concentration-Dependent Transition from Growth Promotion to InhibitionNeuron, 2004
- Insights into activity‐dependent map formation from the retinotectal system: A middle‐of‐the‐brain perspectiveJournal of Neurobiology, 2004
- Guidance and topographic stabilization of nasal chick retinal axons on target-derived components in vitroNeuron, 1993