The meaning and measurement of size hierarchies in plant populations
- 1 March 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Oecologia
- Vol. 61 (3) , 334-336
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00379630
Abstract
The term “size hierarchy” has been used frequently by plant population biologists but it has not been defined. Positive skewness of the size distribution, which has been used to evaluate size hierarchies, is inappropriate. We suggest that size hierarchy is equivalent to size inequality. Methods developed by economists to evaluate inequalities in wealth and income, the Lorenz curve and Gini Coefficient, provide a useful quantification of inequality and allow us to compare populations. A measure of inequality such as the Gini Coefficient will usually be more appropriate than a measure of skewness for addressing questions concerning plant population structure.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factors Affecting Frequency Distributions of Plant Mass: The Absence of Dominance and Suppression in Competing Monocultures of Festuca ParadoxaEcology, 1983
- Computer-Intensive Methods in StatisticsScientific American, 1983
- STUDIES ON THE POPULATION BIOLOGY OF THE GENUS VIOLA . II. THE EFFECT OF PLANT SIZE ON FITNESS IN VIOLA SORORIAEvolution, 1981
- Age-Specific Survivorship and Reproduction in Phlox drummondiiThe American Naturalist, 1979
- The Costs of Reproduction in the Mayapple Podophyllum Peltatum (Berberidaceae)Ecology, 1977
- Population Growth Rates and Age Versus Stage‐Distribution Models for Teasel (Dipsacus Sylvestris Huds.)Ecology, 1977
- Competition and Stand Structure in Some Even-Aged Plant MonoculturesJournal of Ecology, 1975
- On the measurement of inequalityJournal of Economic Theory, 1970
- Correlated Changes in Plant Size and Number in Plant PopulationsJournal of Ecology, 1970
- Influence of Density on Plant Variation in Fiber Flax, Linum usitatissimum L.1Crop Science, 1967