Standard Versus Intensified Chemotherapy With Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Support in Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer–Lung Cancer Group Phase III Trial—08923
- 1 October 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 20 (19) , 3947-3955
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2002.02.069
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the impact on survival of increasing dose-intensity (DI) of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide (CDE) in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated SCLC patients were randomized to standard CDE (cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 45 mg/m2 on day 1, and etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 every 3 weeks, for five cycles) or intensified CDE (cyclophosphamide 1,250 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 55 mg/m2 on day 1, and etoposide 125 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF] 5 μg/kg/d on days 4 to 13 every 2 weeks, for four cycles). Projected cumulative dose was almost identical on the two arms, whereas projected DI was nearly 90% higher on the intensified arm. Two hundred forty-four patients were enrolled. The first 163 patients were also randomized (2 × 2 factorial design) to prophylactic antibiotics or placebo to assess their impact on preventing febrile leukopenia (FL). This report focuses on chemotherapy DI results. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 54 months, 216 deaths have occurred. Actually delivered DI on the intensified arm was 70% higher than on the standard arm. Intensified CDE was associated with more grade 4 leukopenia (79% v 50%), grade 4 thrombocytopenia (44% v 11%), anorexia, nausea, and mucositis. FL and number of toxic deaths were similar on the two arms. The objective response rate was 79% for the standard arm and 84% for the intensified arm (P = .315). Median survival was 54 weeks and 52 weeks, and the 2-year survival rates were 15% and 18%, respectively (P = .885). CONCLUSION: A 70% increase of CDE actual DI does not translate into an improved outcome in SCLC patients.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of Hematopoietic Progenitors in Whole Blood to Support Dose-Dense Chemotherapy: A Randomized Phase II Trial in Small-Cell Lung Cancer PatientsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Multiple Courses of High-Dose Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, and Etoposide With Peripheral-Blood Progenitor Cells and Filgrastim for Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Feasibility Study by the European Group for Blood and Marrow TransplantationJournal of Clinical Oncology, 1999
- Increasing and planned dose intensity of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and etoposide (ACE) by adding recombinant human methionyl granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC)Clinical Oncology, 1995
- Small Cell Lung CancerChest, 1995
- Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) allows acceleration and dose intensity increase of CEF chemotherapy: a randomised study in patients with advanced breast cancerBritish Journal of Cancer, 1994
- Initial Chemotherapeutic Doses and Survival in Patients with Limited Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Escalating drug delivery in cancer chemotherapy: A review of concepts and practice —Part 2Annals of Oncology, 1993
- Recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor reduces the infectious complications of cytotoxic chemotherapyEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1993
- Reduction by Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor of Fever and Neutropenia Induced by Chemotherapy in Patients with Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Accelerated chemotherapy with or without GM-CSF for small cell lung cancer: a non-randomised pilot studyEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1990