An Econometric Technique versus Traditional Techniques for Obtaining Regional Employment Multipliers: A Comparative Study
- 1 April 1973
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
- Vol. 5 (2) , 273-282
- https://doi.org/10.1068/a050273
Abstract
In this paper the authors compare the forecasting ability of an econometric model, which they developed in another paper, with variants of the more traditional technique of the location quotient. The econometric model provides a new method of delineating a region's employment into basic (export) and nonbasic (service) employment. Employment in the Cleveland, Ohio, (SMSA) was divided into these two categories using respectively the econometric model and two variants of the location quotient, one by Tiebout and the other by Thompson. Employment was forecasted within the sample period (1961–66) and outside the period (1967–69). The accuracy of the forecasts was gauged by calculating Theil's inequality coefficients. The results conclusively showed that the econometric method consistently forecasted more accurately than the other techniques, which registered very poor forecasts outside of the sample period.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE MATHEMATICAL IDENTITY OF THE MULTIPLIERS DERIVED FROM THE ECONOMIC BASE MODEL AND THE INPUT‐OUTPUT MODELJournal of Regional Science, 1969
- A STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF REGIONAL EXPORT ESTIMATING TECHNIQUES*Journal of Regional Science, 1969
- THE SPECIFICATION OF REGIONAL ECONOMETRIC MODELSPapers in Regional Science, 1969
- An Investigation of the Local Employment MultiplierThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1959
- Location Theory and Regional Economic GrowthJournal of Political Economy, 1955
- The Employment Multiplier in an Expanding Industrial Market: Los Angeles County, 1940-47The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1950