Outcomes of Cryosurgery in Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars
- 1 September 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Dermatology
- Vol. 129 (9) , 1146-1151
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1993.01680300074011
Abstract
Background and Design: A variety of therapeutic regimens has been used in keloids and hypertrophic scars with unsatisfactory final results. Application of cryosurgery could be beneficial since it was reported to produce less scarring after treatment of skin tumors compared with other surgical procedures. We performed a prospective consecutive trial of randomly enrolled case series including 32 months of average follow-up to assess the outcomes of cryosurgical treatment in keloids and hypertrophic scars and to determine factors influencing the therapeutic result. Ninety-three white patients, aged 10 to 79 years (median age, 26 years) with keloids (n=55; median duration, 36 months; median size, 4 cm2) and with hypertrophic scars (n=38; median duration, 12 months; median size, 2 cm2) were treated using the contact method. One freeze-thaw cycle of 30 seconds per lesion and session was employed, and, if needed, treatment was repeated every 20 to 30 days. Results: Excellent responses (ER) were recorded in 30 subjects (32.3%), good responses (GR) in 27 (29.0%), poor responses (PR) in 27 (29.0%), while nine subjects (9.7%) did not respond at all. Hypertrophic scars responded better (n=38; GR to ER, 76.3%) than keloids (n=55; GR to ER, 50.9%;P<.005; odds ratio, 6.92). No progressions or recurrences occurred. Histologically, neovascularization, loss of the anarchic arrangement of collagen bundles, increased fibroblasts in a stroma running parallel to the skin surface, and mononuclear cells mostly arranged at the perivascular area were found in clinically responding lesions. Improved responses were detected in subjects treated with three or more sessions (n=57; GR to ER, 78.9%) compared with subjects treated once or twice (n=36; GR to ER, 33.3%;P<.001; odds ratio, 13.68). The cryosurgical treatment was generally well tolerated, with local pain during freezing and/or shortly after treatment (n=32, 34.4%) and hypopigmentation or hyperpigmentation (n=11, 11.8%) being the most frequent side effects. Conclusions: Cryosurgery was found effective and safe in keloids and, especially, in hypertrophic scars, in an open, uncontrolled study. Satisfactory results could be obtained after at least three cryosurgical sessions of 30 seconds each, applied once monthly using the contact method of treatment. (Arch Dermatol.1993;129:1146-1151)This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Keloids: a review of the literatureBritish Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1990
- On the nature of keloid and hypertrophic scarsBritish Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1990
- KeloidsDermatologic Clinics, 1988
- Keloids: Scar RevisionThe Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology, 1986
- Cyro Corner: A Cryoprobe for the Therapy of Linear KeloidThe Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology, 1983
- The Response of Keloid Scars to CryosurgeryPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1982
- Treatment of keloid scars by combined cryosurgery and intralesional corticosteroidsAesthetic Plastic Surgery, 1982
- The historical and scientific basis of cryosurgeryClinical and Experimental Dermatology, 1982
- The Combined Use of Cryosurgery and Intralesional Injections of Suspensions of Fluorinated Adrenocorticosteroids for Reducing Keloids and Hypertrophic ScarsThe Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology, 1979
- The Course of Events following CryosurgeryThe Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology, 1977