Short-term effect of testosterone treatment on reduced bone density in boys with constitutional delay of puberty
Open Access
- 1 October 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Vol. 10 (10) , 1488-1495
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650101009
Abstract
We studied bone mineral content (BMC), bone mineral density (BMD), cortical thickness/total width (CT/TW) ratio and cortical area/total area (CA/TA) ratio in boys with constitutional delay of puberty and the effect of short-term testosterone treatment on bone mass. Seventeen boys (age 13.1-15.8 years) who met the family history and the clinical criteria of constitutional delay of puberty were selected and enrolled in the study. All subjects were eating a diet assuring an adequate intake of calories and calcium. A subset of 8 boys (group A) was treated with testosterone depot (100 mg/month x 6 months) while 9 boys (group B) were not. At inclusion, BMC and BMD were reduced in the patients according to their chronological age (BMC -4.04 ± 1.34 standard deviation scores [SDS]; BMD -2.95 ± 0.56 SDS), statural age (BMC -1.75 ± 0.79 SDS; BMD -1.69 ± 0.78 SDS), and bone age (BMC -1.80 ± 0.65 SDS; BMD -1.86 ± 0.68 SDS). No significant differences between the groups were found (group A: BMC 0.480 ± 0.57 g/cm, BMD 0.488 ± 0.037 g/cm2, CT/TW ratio 0.43 ± 0.4, CA/TA ratio 0.68 ± 0.04; group B: BMC 0.476 ± 0.060, p = NS vs. group A; BMD 0.491 ± 0.036 g/cm2, p = NS vs. group A, CT/TW ratio 0.42 ± 0.05, p = NS vs. group A; CA/TA ratio 0.67 ± 0.06, p = NS vs. group A). At 12 months of follow-up, BMC, BMD, CT/TW ratio, and CA/TA ratio significantly increased in group A (BMC 0.70 ± 0.13 g/cm, δ +41.1 ± 28.8%, p < 0.003 vs. 0 month; BMD 0.617 ± 0.082 g/cm2, δ + 26.2 ± 13.6%, p < 0.005 vs. 0 month; CT/TW ratio 0.52 ± 0.05, δ +20.59 ± 10.65%, p < 0.001 vs. 0 month; CA/TA ratio 0.77 ± 0.05, δ +13.60 ± 6.65%, p < 0.004 vs 0 month), but not in group B (BMC: 0.48 ± 0.05 g/cm; δ +5.1 ± 7.8%, p = NS vs. 0 month; BMD: 0.492 ± 0.037 g/cm2; δ + 0.54 ± 8.7%, p = NS vs. 0 month; CT/TW ratio 0.44 ± 0.04, δ +4.04 ± 6.75%, p = NS vs. 0 month; CA/TA ratio 0.68 ± 0.05, δ +2.39 ± 5.90%, p = NS vs. 0 month). We conclude that boys with constitutional delay of puberty have reduced BMC and BMD. The delay in statural and bone ages did not totally account for the decreased bone mass. Testosterone treatment for 6 months significantly increased BMC, BMD, CT/TW ratio, and CA/TA ratio in these patients, but definitive conclusions on the efficacy of the treatment in improving adult bone mass can be drawn only when our patients reach early adulthood.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does constitutional delayed puberty cause segmental disproportion and short stature?European Journal of Pediatrics, 1993
- Effects of long-term treatment with growth hormone on bone and mineral metabolism in children with growth hormone deficiencyThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1993
- Osteopenia in Men with a History of Delayed PubertyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Is testosterone therapy for boys with constitutional delay of growth and puberty associated with impaired final height and suppression of the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis?European Journal of Pediatrics, 1992
- Therapeutic Indications for Delayed Puberty and Hypogonadism in Adolescent BoysHormone Research, 1991
- Final height in boys with untreated constitutional delay in growth and puberty.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1990
- TREATMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL DELAY IN GROWTH AND PUBERTY (CDGP)Clinical Endocrinology, 1989
- Bone mineral status in growth hormone deficiencyThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1980
- Effect of puberty on rates of bone growth and mineralisation: with observations in male delayed puberty.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1979
- RADIOGRAPHIC ATLAS OF SKELETAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE HAND AND WRISTThe Lancet Healthy Longevity, 1959