Uncertainties in Genetic Testing for Chronic Disease
- 4 November 1998
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA)
- Vol. 280 (17) , 1525-1527
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.17.1525
Abstract
Sequencing an individual's DNA seems destined to become an increasingly prominent part of medical care. Once a genetic alteration has been identified and characterized by researchers, testing for it is relatively simple, requiring only white blood cells obtained via a routine blood draw. Because so many diseases are influenced by heredity, investigators are likely to identify numerous alterations associated with illness in the human genome. In the past, genetic testing concerned the next generation: decisions about whether to have a child (eg, Tay-Sachs disease, cystic fibrosis, and Down syndrome) and screening of newborns (eg, phenylketonuria and sickle cell anemia).Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- - Thyroid IncidentalomaPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2012
- The APOE-∊4 Allele and the Risk of Alzheimer Disease Among African Americans, Whites, and HispanicsJAMA, 1998
- Factor V Leiden Mutation and the Risks for Thromboembolic Disease: A Clinical PerspectiveAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- Diagnosis and management of hemochromatosisGastroenterology, 1997
- BRCA1Mutations in Women Attending Clinics That Evaluate the Risk of Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- The Risk of Cancer Associated with Specific Mutations ofBRCA1andBRCA2among Ashkenazi JewsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Contentious Screening Decisions — Does the Choice Matter?New England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Screening for disease.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1997
- Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopiesGastroenterology, 1997
- Research and stored tissues. Persons as sources, samples as persons?Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995