Why Underwrite Rights Offers? Some New Evidence
- 1 January 2008
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
We examine rights issues on the Oslo Stock Exchange, where seasoned public offerings now take place almost exclusively through use of the relatively expensive standby underwriting method rather than unsinsured rights. We show that the propensity to use standby underwriting increases as expected shareholder takeup decreases, that the market reaction to uninsured rights offers is significantly positive, and that standbys elicit the least favorable market reaction to the public issue announcement. These and other cross-sectional results are consistent with the asymmetric information framework of Eckbo and Masulis (1992) and help resolve the longstanding rights offer paradox.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Capital raising, underwriting and the certification hypothesisPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- How investment bankers determine the offer price and allocation of new issuesPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- THE COSTS OF EQUITY ISSUES SINCE RULE 415: A CLOSER LOOKJournal of Financial Research, 1993
- Shelf Registration and the Reduced Due Diligence Argument: Implications of the Underwriter Certification and the Implicit Insurance HypothesesJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1990
- Investment banking, reputation, and the underpricing of initial public offeringsJournal of Financial Economics, 1986
- Equity issues and offering dilutionJournal of Financial Economics, 1986
- Issuing costs to existing shareholders in competitive and negotiated underwritten public utility equity offeringsJournal of Financial Economics, 1986
- The Rule 415 Experiment: Equity MarketsThe Journal of Finance, 1985
- Convertible debt issuance, capital structure change and financing-related informationJournal of Financial Economics, 1984
- The effect of pre-emptive right amendments on shareholder wealthJournal of Financial Economics, 1983