Ultrasound and Computer Tomography in the Evaluation of Focal Liver Disease
- 1 September 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Acta Radiologica. Diagnosis
- Vol. 22 (5) , 545-548
- https://doi.org/10.1177/028418518102200506
Abstract
The results of ultrasound [US] and computed tomography [CT] in 150 patients with possible focal liver disease were compared. US was more sensitive than CT in detecting lesions but similar information on the nature of the lesion was obtained with both methods. CT provided more complete information than US on the extent of the lesion. CT and US are supplementary in the evaluation of focal liver disease. Because of the higher sensitivity US should be the 1st examination, followed, if clinically indicated, by CT for confirmation and possible further information regarding the extent of the lesion.This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Introduction to clinical decision makingSeminars in Nuclear Medicine, 1978
- Diagnostic accuracy of CT in circumscript liver diseaseAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1978
- Isodense masses on CT: differentiation by gray scale ultrasonographyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1977
- Correlation of Computed Tomography, Gray Scale Ultrasonography, and Radionuclide Imaging of the Liver in Detecting Space-Occupying ProcessesRadiology, 1977
- Accuracy of Computed Tomography of the Liver and Biliary TractRadiology, 1977
- Nuclear Imaging, Tomographic Nuclear Imaging, and Gray Scale Ultrasound in the Evaluation of the Porta HepatisRadiology, 1977
- Energy-selective reconstructions in X-ray computerised tomographyPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 1976
- Gray Scale Ultrasonic Investigation of Focal Defects on99mTc Sulphur Colloid Liver ScanningRadiology, 1976
- Computed Tomography of the Thorax and Abdomen; A Preliminary ReportRadiology, 1975
- A comparison of ultrasonic and isotope scanning in the diagnosis of liver diseaseThe British Journal of Radiology, 1970