Statistical Power Analysis and Reliability of Measurement
- 1 October 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of General Psychology
- Vol. 116 (4) , 359-369
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1989.9921123
Abstract
Reliability of measurement as a determinant of the power of significance tests is investigated using concepts from statistical power analysis and from test and measurement theory. Results of specific power calculations based on measures of effect size together with particular reliability coefficients are presented in the form of tables. The importance of assumptions about true variance, error variance, and observed variance in determining the relation between reliability and power is emphasized, and a formula relating power and test length, analogous to the Spearman-Brown formula in test theory, is derived.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Note on the reliability of experimental measures and the power of significance tests.Psychological Bulletin, 1986
- Reliability of measurement and the power of statistical tests: Some new results.Psychological Bulletin, 1983
- Dependent variable reliability and the power of significance tests.Psychological Bulletin, 1978
- Comment on Overall and Woodward's asserted paradox concerning the measurement of change.Psychological Bulletin, 1976
- Unreliability of difference scores: A paradox for measurement of change.Psychological Bulletin, 1975
- ERROR OF MEASUREMENT AND THE POWER OF A STATISTICAL TESTBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1969
- Error of Measurement and the Sensitivity of a Test of SignificancePsychometrika, 1958