Clinical Encounters with Outpatient coercion at the CMHC: Questions of Implementation and efficacy
- 1 April 1992
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Springer Nature in Community Mental Health Journal
- Vol. 28 (2) , 81-94
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00754275
Abstract
Clinical encounters with three outpatients at a CMHC who were managed with alternating periods of voluntary or uncoerced and involuntary or coerced treatment are presented. The two periods of coerced community treatment—of eight months and then two to four years duration—produced positive results quite distinct from the periods of uncoerced community treatment. In discussing the implementation and efficacy of coerced outpatient treatment at the CMHC, the author addresses legal, clinical, and resource issues which form the basis for seven arguments often heard as to why staffs at CMHCs hesitate to employ involuntary or coercive interventions.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why must some schizophrenic patients be involuntarily committed? The role of insightComprehensive Psychiatry, 1989
- Outpatient civil commitment of the mentally ill: An overview and an updateBehavioral Sciences & the Law, 1988
- The promise and peril of involuntary outpatient commitment.American Psychologist, 1987
- The promise and peril of involuntary outpatient commitment.American Psychologist, 1987
- The American States and the Age of School SystemsAmerican Journal of Education, 1984
- Developing and Maintaining Adherence to Long-term Drug-taking RegimensSchizophrenia Bulletin, 1984
- Why do patients with manic-depressive illness stop their lithium?Comprehensive Psychiatry, 1975
- Setting LimitsArchives of General Psychiatry, 1968
- Acting OutArchives of General Psychiatry, 1965
- Hypersensitivity to PethidineBMJ, 1951