Increasing students' choice‐making consistency: The effect of decision rule‐use training
- 1 April 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Education
- Vol. 37 (2) , 95-105
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528809378707
Abstract
The present study examined the extent to which the inability to translate decisionally revelant information into matrix form and knowledge about decision rule use act as impediments to consistent choice‐making. Participants were provided with five decision making cases in written paragraph form and no instruction, five decision making cases accompanied by the data in matrix form and no instruction, the paragraph form cases and one hour of instruction including the selection and calculation of decision rules or matrix information and instruction. Results indicate that instruction, in decision matrix construction and decision rule application, increases students' decision making consistency. The advisability of advocating particular rules and the merits of consistency are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cognitive Backlog and Decision Rule UseCommunication Research Reports, 1987
- An Exploratory Study of Decision Rule use Among College StudentsCommunication Research Reports, 1986
- CULTIVATING IMAGINATION: FACTORS THAT ENHANCE AND INHIBIT CREATIVITY IN BRAINSTORMING GROUPSHuman Communication Research, 1981
- Implications for problem?solving groups of empirical research on ‘brainstorming’: A critical review of the literatureSouthern Speech Communication Journal, 1978
- Interpersonal perception and group brainstorming performanceCommunication Quarterly, 1978
- Potential inhibitory effects of group participation on brainstorming performanceCentral States Speech Journal, 1977
- Incorporating Judgments in Sales Forecasts: Application of the Delphi Method at American Hoist & DerrickInterfaces, 1977
- A practical approach to DelphiFutures, 1970
- Concern for consensusQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1961
- How we think.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1910