On the sample size for one‐sided equivalence of sensitivities based upon McNemar's test
- 30 August 1995
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 14 (16) , 1831-1839
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780141611
Abstract
In this paper we formalize the problem of testing the one‐sided equivalence in the sensitivities of two medical diagnostic tests under a matched‐pair study design. We derive conditional and unconditional sample size formulae which are decreasing functions of the probability of being diagnosed by both tests. We calculate upper boundary and midpoint sample sizes. Results of a Monte Carlo simulation study that compares the proposed sample size formulae with that of Lachenbruch suggest that our midpoint conditional sample size is the best choice to obtain the desired power for the type of equivalence studies discussed in the paper.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the sample size for studies based upon mcnemar's testStatistics in Medicine, 1992
- Power and sample size evaluation for the mcnemar test with application to matched case‐control studiesStatistics in Medicine, 1992
- The 2 x 2 Matched-Pairs Trial: Exact Unconditional Design and AnalysisBiometrics, 1991
- How to establish equivalence between treatments: A one‐sided clinical trial in paediatric oncologyStatistics in Medicine, 1989
- Sample size and power for pair‐matched case‐control studiesStatistics in Medicine, 1987
- Sample Size for Individually Matched Case-Control StudiesBiometrics, 1986
- Factors determining steric course of enzymic glycosylation reactions: glycosyl transfer products formed from 2,6-anhydro-1-deoxy-D-gluco-hept-1-enitol by .alpha.-glucosidases and an inverting exo-.alpha.-glucanaseBiochemistry, 1982