Life history and the evolution of family living in birds
- 20 March 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by The Royal Society in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 274 (1616) , 1349-1357
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0117
Abstract
The reason why some bird species live in family groups is an important question of evolutionary biology that remains unanswered. Families arise when young delay the onset of independent reproduction and remain with their parents beyond independence. Explanations for why individuals forgo independent reproduction have hitherto focused on dispersal constraints, such as the absence of high-quality breeding openings. However, while constraints successfully explain within-population dispersal decisions, they fail as an ultimate explanation for variation in family formation across species. Most family-living species are long-lived and recent life-history studies demonstrated that a delayed onset of reproduction can be adaptive in long-lived species. Hence, delayed dispersal and reproduction might be an adaptive life-history decision rather than 'the best of a bad job'. Here, we attempt to provide a predictive framework for the evolution of families by integrating life-history theory into family formation theory. We suggest that longevity favours a delayed onset of reproduction and gives parents the opportunity of a prolonged investment in offspring, an option which is not available for short-lived species. Yet, parents should only prolong their investment in offspring if this increases offspring survival and outweighs the fitness cost that parents incur, which is only possible under ecological conditions, such as a predictable access to resources. We therefore propose that both life-history and ecological factors play a role in determining the evolution of family living across species, yet we suggest different mechanisms than those proposed by previous models.Keywords
This publication has 77 references indexed in Scilit:
- Experimentally increased food resources in the natal territory promote offspring philopatry and helping in cooperatively breeding carrion crowsProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2006
- Does year‐round territoriality rather than habitat saturation explain delayed natal dispersal and cooperative breeding in the carrion crow?Journal of Animal Ecology, 2005
- Family‐based territoriality vs flocking in wintering common cranes Grus grusJournal of Avian Biology, 2004
- Reproductive effort reduces long-term immune function in breeding tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor)Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2003
- Emperor penguins and climate changeNature, 2001
- Cooperative breeding in birds: the role of ecologyBehavioral Ecology, 1999
- Cooperative breeding in birds: a comparative test of the life history hypothesisProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1998
- Helping Communal Breeding in BirdsPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1987
- Determinants of Social Rank in Goose Flocks: Acquisition of Social Rank in Young GeeseBehaviour, 1987
- Social dominance in communal Mexican jays Aphelocoma ultramarinaAnimal Behaviour, 1986