Penile block for circumcision?
- 1 September 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Anaesthesia
- Vol. 38 (9) , 862-866
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1983.tb12251.x
Abstract
A prospective blind trial was conducted comparing the analgesia and adverse effects produced by caudal extradural blockade (caudal block) with blockade of the dorsal nerves of the penis (penile block) in 38 boys undergoing elective circumcision. Analgesia was assessed by senior nurses using a linear analogue scale and by the response to direct questioning over the first 7 hours after surgery. The degree and duration of postoperative analgesia was similar in the two groups. However, the caudal block group had a higher incidence of motor blockade (p = less than 0.01). One technical failure occurred in the penile block group. It is concluded that a penile block is a satisfactory alternative to caudal blockade with regard to postoperative analgesia and offers several specific advantages.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Caudal Block for Post‐Operative Pain Relief in Children after Genital Operations. A Comparison Between Bupivacaine and MorphineActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1981
- Penile Block for Postoperative Pain Relief in Penile SurgeryJournal of Urology, 1981
- Bacteriologic Comparison Between Epidural and Caudal TechniquesAnesthesiology, 1980
- Postoperative analgesia after circumcisionAnaesthesia, 1979
- SPREAD OF EXTRADURAL ANALGESIA FOLLOWING CAUDAL INJECTION IN CHILDREN: A statistical studyBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1977
- An alternative block for the relief of pain of circumcisionAnaesthesia, 1975
- Caudal block for post-operative pain relief in children.Anaesthesia, 1975
- Caudal block for post‐operative pain relief in childrenAnaesthesia, 1974
- An analysis of the complications of extradural and caudal blockAnaesthesia, 1969
- Emotional Implications of Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy on ChildrenThe Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 1952