Looking Beneath the Surface
- 6 December 2002
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 298 (5600) , 1903-1904
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1079808
Abstract
Global climate change is expected to have ecological consequences. Field studies attempting to simulate these effects often do not investigate multiple environmental factors and may therefore miss some important feedbacks. In his Perspective, [Morgan][1] highlights the multiple-factor, 3-year field study reported by [Shaw][2] et al ., who find that increasing COmay inhibit plant growth. Morgan discusses possible explanations for this counterintuitive result, but cautions that short-term, transient responses may not reflect the long-term ecological response. [1]: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/298/5600/1903 [2]: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/short/298/5600/1987Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Grassland Responses to Global Environmental Changes Suppressed by Elevated CO 2Science, 2002
- Experimental confirmation of ecosystem model predictions comparing transient and equilibrium plant responses to elevated atmospheric CO2Ecology Letters, 2001
- Elevated atmospheric CO2, fine roots and the response of soil microorganisms: a review and hypothesisNew Phytologist, 2000
- Dynamics of mineral N availability in grassland ecosystems under increased [CO2]: hypotheses evaluated using the Hurley Pasture ModelPlant and Soil, 2000
- Responses of wild C4 and C3 grass (Poaceae) species to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration: a meta‐analytic test of current theories and perceptionsGlobal Change Biology, 1999
- MORE EFFICIENT PLANTS: A Consequence of Rising Atmospheric CO2?Annual Review of Plant Biology, 1997
- Plant growth and reproduction along CO2 gradients: non‐linear responses and implications for community changeGlobal Change Biology, 1995
- Evidence of a feedback mechanism limiting plant response to elevated carbon dioxideNature, 1993