The Social and Collaborative Nature of Entrepreneurship Scholarship: A Co–Citation and Perceptual Analysis
- 1 May 2006
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
- Vol. 30 (3) , 417-441
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00127.x
Abstract
This article explores the structure of the “metafield” of entrepreneurship in two related ways. First, author co–citation analysis establishes a collective view of the structure of the entrepreneurship literature as perceived by its research–active members. The co–citation frequencies of 78 prominent entrepreneurship researchers were analyzed using multivariate techniques. Cluster analysis and multidimensional scaling were used to explore the intellectual structure of entrepreneurship research by identifying groups of scholars whose work falls into similar areas. Factor analysis was then used to identify the underlying themes that characterize and define the field. Finally, the scholars within these nominal groupings were approached using individualized questionnaires to explore what social interactions might parallel, reflect, or underpin the intellectual ones. The study has given empirical support to a number of oft–quoted beliefs about entrepreneurship as a field of study, such as: (1) the occurrence of fragmentation from an early stage in its development; (2) that the difficulty of categorizing subfields unambiguously mirrors that in the metafield itself; (3) that there is a relative paucity of scholarship cited across—as opposed to within—these subfields; and (4) that there is evolution within the meta–field of national differences in the topics studied and citation patterns thereto. In addition, the study demonstrates that there are real and robust social and collaborative networks underlying the generation of the work which is cited jointly by third parties. The latter authors may be unaware of these networks. Equally, the co–cited authors, while recognizing overlapping interests, may have difficulty in categorizing this commonality in their contributions. Entrepreneurship research is shown to be very much a social activity, although this may be invisible to outsiders or novitiates.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Entrepreneurship Research in Emergence: Past Trends and Future DirectionsJournal of Management, 2003
- Entrepreneurship Research in Emergence: Past Trends and Future DirectionsJournal of Management, 2003
- The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of ResearchAcademy of Management Review, 2000
- Mapping the intellectual structure of information retrieval studies: an author co-citation analysis, 1987-1997Journal of Information Science, 1999
- Searching for bridges between disciplines: an author co-citation analysis on the research into scholarly communicationJournal of Information Science, 1996
- CHANGES IN THE NATURE OF UK SMALL BUSINESS RESEARCH, 1980–1990. PART TWO: CHANGES IN THE NATURE OF THE OUTPUTJournal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 1995
- Mapping intellectual structure of a scientific subfield through author cocitationsJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 1990
- Entrepreneurship: An Integrating Typology and Evaluation of the Empirical Research in the FieldJournal of Management, 1987
- Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structureJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 1981
- Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective FunctionJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1963