Extent and Importance of Cross-Resistance to Efavirenz after Nevirapine Failure
- 20 July 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses
- Vol. 18 (11) , 771-775
- https://doi.org/10.1089/08892220260139503
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity of efavirenz after the failure of a nevirapine-containing regimen. This prospective study included 47 patients with plasma HIV loads >1000 copies/ml, and who had received nevirapine for at least 16 weeks, included in an efavirenz-based salvage regimen. The main outcome measure was virological response, defined as an HIV RNA level decrease of at least 1 log10 copies/ml after 24 weeks, according to genotypic and phenotypic resistance to efavirenz. Phenotypic resistance was defined as a >10-fold increase in the IC50. The median CD4+ cell count was 236 × 106/liter and the median HIV RNA level was 4.5 log10 copies/ml. Mutations known to decrease susceptibility to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors were observed in 79% of patients, predominantly at residues 181 (49%), 103 (40%), and 106 (19%), but phenotypic resistance to efavirenz was seen in 62% of cases. All the strains with the K103N mutation showed high-level resistance to efavirenz, in contrast with 20% of those carrying exclusively the Y181C mutation. By week 24, 38% of patients had responded and 19% had achieved an undetectable HIV load. Virological failure was observed in patients with phenotypic resistance to efavirenz (67 vs. 11%; relative risk [RR], 4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-14.89; p = 0.04), or in presence of the K103N mutation (52 vs. 17%; RR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.12-2.79; p = 0.02), and these results remained unchanged after adjusting for HIV load, or by resistance to the accompanying drugs in the salvage regimen. A previous longer period of nevirapine therapy was significantly associated with the emergence of efavirenz resistance (288 vs. 170 days, p < 0.01). We conclude that genotypic and/or phenotypic resistance assays permit the sequential use of nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in the clinical setting. Our data suggest that an early change after nevirapine failure could avoid the emergence of efavirenz resistance.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genotypic Correlates of Phenotypic Resistance to Efavirenz in Virus Isolates from Patients Failing Nonnucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor TherapyJournal of Virology, 2001
- Salvage therapy with abacavir plus efavirenz or nevirapine in HIV-1-infected persons with previous nucleoside analogue and protease inhibitor useAIDS, 2000
- Antiretroviral Drug Resistance Testing in Adult HIV-1 InfectionJAMA, 2000
- Rapid Communication: Efavirenz- and Adefovir Dipivoxil–Based Salvage Therapy in Highly Treatment-Experienced Patients: Clinical and Genotypic Predictors of Virologic ResponseJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2000
- Patterns of Resistance Mutations Selected by Treatment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection with Zidovudine, Didanosine, and NevirapineThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2000
- Antiretroviral Therapy in AdultsJAMA, 2000
- Efavirenz plus Zidovudine and Lamivudine, Efavirenz plus Indinavir, and Indinavir plus Zidovudine and Lamivudine in the Treatment of HIV-1 Infection in AdultsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Activities of cefepime and five other antibiotics against nosocomial PER-1-type and/or OXA-10-type beta-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp.Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1998
- The role of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) in the therapy of HIV-1 infection1Presented at the Eleventh International Conference on Antiviral Research, San Diego, CA, 5–10 April 1998.1Antiviral Research, 1998
- Identification of the human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase residues that contribute to the activity of diverse nonnucleoside inhibitorsAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1992