Effect of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Bimanual Movements
Open Access
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Neurophysiology
- Vol. 93 (1) , 53-63
- https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01063.2003
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex can interrupt voluntary contralateral rhythmic limb movements. Using the method of “resetting index” (RI), our study investigated the TMS effect on different types of bimanual movements. Six normal subjects participated. For unimanual movement, each subject tapped either the right or left index finger at a comfortable rate. For bimanual movement, index fingers of both hands tapped in the same (in-phase) direction or in the opposite (antiphase) direction. TMS was applied to each hemisphere separately at various intensities from 0.5 to 1.5 times motor threshold (MT). TMS interruption of rhythm was quantified by RI. For the unimanual movements, TMS disrupted both contralateral and ipsilateral rhythmic hand movements, although the effect was much less in the ipsilateral hand. For the bimanual in-phase task, TMS could simultaneously reset the rhythmic movements of both hands, but the effect on the contralateral hand was less and the effect on the ipsilateral hand was more compared with the unimanual tasks. Similar effects were seen from right and left hemisphere stimulation. TMS had little effect on the bimanual antiphase task. The equal effect of right and left hemisphere stimulation indicates that neither motor cortex is dominant for simple bimanual in-phase movement. The smaller influence of contralateral stimulation and the greater effect of ipsilateral stimulation during bimanual in-phase movement compared with unimanual movement suggest hemispheric coupling. The antiphase movements were resistant to TMS disruption, and this suggests that control of rhythm differs in the 2 tasks. TMS produced a transient asynchrony of movements on the 2 sides, indicating that both motor cortices might be downstream of the clocking command or that the clocking is a consequence of the 2 hemispheres communicating equally with each other.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Role of the Medial Wall and Its Anatomical Variations for Bimanual Antiphase and In-Phase MovementsNeuroImage, 2001
- Modulation of primary orthostatic tremor by magnetic stimulation over the motor cortexJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1998
- Rate Dependence of Regional Cerebral Activation during Performance of a Repetitive Motor Task: A PET StudyJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 1996
- The accuracy and precision of timing of self-paced, repetitive movements in subjects with Parkinson's diseaseBrain, 1996
- Resetting of essential tremor and postural tremor in Parkinson's disease with transcranial magnetic stimulationMuscle & Nerve, 1994
- Interhemispheric interaction in children of 7–8: Analysis of EEG coherence and finger tapping parametersBehavioural Brain Research, 1994
- Modulation of postural wrist tremors by magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in patients with Parkinson's disease or essential tremor and in normal subjects mimicking tremorAnnals of Neurology, 1993
- Performance on unimanual and bimanual tapping tasks by patients with lesions of the frontal or temporal lobeNeuropsychologia, 1988
- Motor Disorder and the Timing of Repetitive MovementsAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1984
- Perturbations of auditory feedback delay and the timing of movement.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977