Durkheim's cult of the individual as civil religion: Its appropriation by Erving Goffman
- 1 April 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Sociological Spectrum
- Vol. 13 (2) , 251-275
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.1993.9982028
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to provide a systematic analysis of the place of Durkheim's “cult of the individual” in Erving Goffman's sociology.1 I have reviewed the most pertinent aspects of Durkheim's sociology of religion. This article discusses and/or analyzes the development of the cult of the individual primarily within the context of Durkheim's (1951) monograph on suicide; Durkheim's notions of sacred, profane, and ritual; Goffman's two‐pronged intellectual heritage; and Goffman's “Communication Conduct in an Island Community” (1953) with respect to several key Durkheimian concepts. Also discussed are several important secondary analyses—primarily those of Jurgen Habermas and Stanford Lyman—which help to further delineate the conditions of the Durkheim‐Goffman link. The final section applies Goffman's sociology to the case of Evangelicalism and “political civility.”This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is the Presented Self Sincere? Goffman, Impression Management and the Postmodern SelfTheory, Culture & Society, 1992
- Social influences on belief in creationismSociological Spectrum, 1992
- Durkheim's Individual in Society: A Sacred Marriage?Journal of the History of Ideas, 1992
- Sociology and the ProsaicSociological Inquiry, 1991
- The descent of the egoPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1990
- The Interaction Order Sui Generis: Goffman's Contribution to Social TheorySociological Theory, 1987
- The Passing of Intellectual Generations: Reflections on the Death of Erving GoffmanSociological Theory, 1986
- Religion and Political Civility: The Coming Generation of American EvangelicalsJournal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 1984
- Commemorative essay. Erving Goffman† (1922-1982)Semiotica, 1983
- Religious EvolutionAmerican Sociological Review, 1964