Common statistical errors in the design and analysis of subfertility trials.
Open Access
- 1 May 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Human Reproduction
- Vol. 18 (5) , 1000-1004
- https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg133
Abstract
The quality of clinical trials has received increasing attention with the growth of evidence-based medicine and systematic reviews. We aimed to identify whether errors and omissions commonly encountered when undertaking Cochrane reviews in this field are still passing peer review.Keywords
This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: