Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research
Top Cited Papers
- 1 March 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Current Opinion in Rheumatology
- Vol. 14 (2) , 109-114
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00002281-200203000-00006
Abstract
The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for an instrument is a much sought after, but elusive figure. In this review we will highlight new findings in this area, including taxonomy of MCID, methods used to ascertain MCID, the perspective taken for evaluating importance, and other sources of variation for MCID values. In the end we believe the MCID will be a context-specific value rather than a fixed number. The review highlights the need to do methodological research in this area, especially concurrent comparisons between approaches, or across different patient groups. There are many faces to the MCID, it is not a simple concept, nor simple to calculate.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- A taxonomy for responsivenessJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2001
- The Concept of Clinically Meaningful Difference in Health-Related Quality of Life ResearchPharmacoEconomics, 2000
- Interpretation of Quality-of-Life OutcomesMedical Care, 2000
- Sensitivity to Change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: Part 1PTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 1998
- An Assessment of Clinical Wound Evaluation ScalesAcademic Emergency Medicine, 1998
- Warfarin for atrial fibrillation. The patient's perspectiveArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1996
- Spirometry and Dyspnea in Patients With COPDChest, 1996
- Health status, quality of life, and the individualPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- Assessing the clinical importance of symptomatic improvements. An illustration in rheumatologyArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1993
- Measurement of health statusControlled Clinical Trials, 1989