‘I Is; Therefore I Am’: The Census as Practice of Double Identification
Open Access
- 1 July 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Sociological Research Online
- Vol. 13 (4) , 69-81
- https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1778
Abstract
I examine practices of modern census making with a specific focus on Canadian censuses of population from 1911-1951. My analysis builds on the work of two recent and related streams of research in the social sciences. One draws from Foucault's writings on biopower and post-Foucauldian governmentality studies. It examines the census as a political technology that produces a specific knowledge or political arithmetic (statistics) of the population, so that its forces and strengths can be acted upon by various state authorities. The census is thus understood as a field for the administration of the state. The other focuses on how censuses are socially constructed, on the ‘making’ of censuses as opposed to the ‘taking’ of censuses and the use of census data as ‘evidence’. These studies document how the interests and political influence of various actors shape census making. The census is thus understood as a particular way of defining, collecting and organising social observations about individuals and not a simple reflection of an empirically existing reality. While the two streams of research have usefully challenged the facticity of census data, they have tended to reinforce a division between the real and the constructed. For if census data is not ‘real’ but a particular construction then what exactly does it represent? I contend that censuses are part of myriad identification practices that have come to produce subjects who are able to recognise and identify themselves in relation to the categories constructed and circulated by the census. It is through processes of double identification (state-citizen) that census categories come into existence, become facts and can then in turn not only be measured, analysed and assembled (objectification) but also be identified with (subjectification). The presence of such double identification makes an ostensible division between facticity and representation artificial.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Case Study of the Impact of Statistical Disclosure Control on Data Quality in the Individual UK Samples of Anonymised RecordsEnvironment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2007
- Geocoding and Mapping Historical Census Data: The Geographical Component of the Canadian Century Research InfrastructureHistorical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, 2007
- The role of statistics on ethnic origin and ‘race’ in Canadian anti‐discrimination policyInternational Social Science Journal, 2005
- Enacting the socialEconomy and Society, 2004
- The Information State in EnglandPublished by Springer Nature ,2004
- Governing by numbers: Figuring out democracyPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Foucault on Governmentality and Population: The Impossible DiscoveryCanadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 2002
- Do the social sciences create phenomena?: the example of public opinion researchBritish Journal of Sociology, 1999
- Introduction: Social History and Case Files ResearchPublished by University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) ,1998
- Social Space and Symbolic PowerSociological Theory, 1989