Life-history patterns and sociality in canids: Body size, reproduction, and behavior
- 1 September 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Oecologia
- Vol. 50 (3) , 386-390
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00344981
Abstract
Empirical associations among co-adapted traits such as body size and patterns of reproduction, development, and behavior are unknown for most animal species, despite numerous theories suggesting otherwise. One way to study these complex relationships is first to consider closely related species and then to generalize findings to other groups. In the present study, relationships among body size, reproductive patterns, development, and sociality were examined in 17 members of the family Canidae (canids). Large canids are more social than smaller species, and offspring of large species achieve independence and tend to breed first at a later age. Large females give birth to absolutely larger young, but relative to their own body weight they allocate fewer resources to bringing a large pup to term. Overall, sexual dimorphism in size is small to moderate, and this is associated with monogamous mating habits and paternal care of young.This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sociality as a life-history tactic of ground squirrelsOecologia, 1981
- Mammalian Sibling InteractionsPublished by Springer Nature ,1981
- The Social Ecology of CoyotesScientific American, 1980
- Mammals, resources and reproductive strategiesNature, 1978
- Primate ecology and social organizationJournal of Zoology, 1977
- Mammalian Dispersal and the Ontogeny of Individual Behavioral PhenotypesThe American Naturalist, 1977
- Physical Development in Coyotes (Canis latrans), with a Comparison to Other CanidsJournal of Mammalogy, 1975
- The Evolution of Marmot Societies: A General TheoryScience, 1974
- Period of gestation and body weight in some placental mammalsComparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology, 1972
- The Population Consequences of Life History PhenomenaThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 1954