How NICE may be outflanked
- 25 May 2006
- Vol. 332 (7552) , 1268-1271
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7552.1268
Abstract
Individual benefit or common good? When many people share common resources, it is rational for each individual to increase personal use of the resources. But if all individuals do this, the resources are overexploited and eventually everyone will be ruined. This is termed the tragedy of commons.3 The NHS is a common resource. A patient acts rationally in seeking an expensive treatment that produces a benefit (even if small), because the cost falls almost entirely on others. But the NHS cannot support overexploitation indefinitely. It already spends £10.3bn (€15bn; $19bn) a year on drugs, and costs are rising rapidly.w1 One way to avoid overexploitation is to appoint a guardian to administer the commons. NICE plays this role but faces many challenges.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- What's the evidence that NICE guidance has been implemented? Results from a national evaluation using time series analysis, audit of patients' notes, and interviewsBMJ, 2004
- Increasing use of a new health technology during the wait for NICE guidance: findings from the third national tracker survey of photodynamic therapyJournal of Public Health, 2004
- Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials.2004
- Relationships between the pharmaceutical industry and patients' organisationsBMJ, 2003
- The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costsJournal of Health Economics, 2003
- Association between competing interests and authors' conclusions: epidemiological study of randomised clinical trials published in the BMJBMJ, 2002
- Selling sickness: the pharmaceutical industry and disease mongering * Commentary: Medicalisation of risk factorsBMJ, 2002
- Evaluation of Conflict of Interest in Economic Analyses of New Drugs Used in OncologyJAMA, 1999
- Newly licensed drugsBMJ, 1996
- The tragedy of the commons. The population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality.1968