COMPARISON OF BRACKETING AND MATRIXING DESIGNS FOR A TWO-YEAR STABILITY STUDY
- 24 April 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
- Vol. 10 (2) , 217-228
- https://doi.org/10.1081/bip-100101023
Abstract
In the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines for stability testing of new drug products, both bracketing and matrixing designs were suggested as the statistical designs. More recently, they have increasing attention from pharmaceutical companies, because both designs reduce the cost of stability studies. The purpose of this paper is to investigate both designs in terms of the power of detection of significant difference between slopes, and use the mean square error to evaluate the precision of estimated drug shelf life. Additionally, the distributions of both designs are compared by using 1000 simulations.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Expiration Dating of Pharmaceutical Compounds in Relation to Analytical Variation, Degradation Rate, and Matrix DesignsDrug Information Journal, 1997
- Some optimal matrix designs in stability studiesJournal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 1997
- New Designs for Stability Testing Programs: Matrix or Factorial Designs. Authorities' Viewpoint on the Predictive Value of Such StudiesDrug Information Journal, 1992
- Statistical comparison of stability study designsJournal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 1992
- Samples from Finite PopulationsPublished by Elsevier ,1990