Comparison of presentation, treatment, and outcome of acute myocardial infarction in men versus women (the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Registry)
- 1 July 1996
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 78 (1) , 9-14
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00218-4
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Causes of higher in-hospital mortality in women than in men after acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1994
- A community-wide perspective of gender differences and temporal trends in the use of diagnostic and revascularization procedures for acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- Underutilization of thrombolytic therapy in eligible women with acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1991
- Differences in the Use of Procedures between Women and Men Hospitalized for Coronary Heart DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Optimal utilization of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: Concepts and controversiesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1990
- In-hospital mortality and clinical course of 20 891 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction randomised between alteplase and streptokinase with or without heparinThe Lancet, 1990
- Myocardial Infarction in WomenCardiology, 1990
- Risk factors and in-hospital course of first episode of myocardial infarction or acute coronary insufficiency in womenJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1988
- Effects of gender and race on prognosis after myocardial infarction: Adverse prognosis for women, particularly black womenJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1987
- The clinical significance of bundle branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. 1. Clinical characteristics, hospital mortality, and one-year follow-up.Circulation, 1978