SUCCESSFUL METHODS TO REDUCE FALSE-POSITIVE MAMMOGRAPHY INTERPRETATIONS
- 1 July 2000
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Radiologic Clinics of North America
- Vol. 38 (4) , 693-700
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0033-8389(05)70194-9
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- American College of Radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1998
- Ten-Year Risk of False Positive Screening Mammograms and Clinical Breast ExaminationsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1998
- Clinical outcome of doubtful mammographic findings.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1996
- Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sampleArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1996
- Variability in Radiologists' Interpretations of MammogramsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Mammography screening — reasons for recall and the influence of experience on recall in the finnish systemClinical Radiology, 1990
- The importance of supplementary mammographic views to diagnostic accuracyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1988
- Practical solutions to common mammographic problems: tailoring the examinationAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1988
- Breast cancer missed by mammographyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1979