F-Test Bias for Experimental Designs in Educational Research
- 1 September 1955
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Psychometrika
- Vol. 20 (3) , 227-248
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02289019
Abstract
Reference is made to Neyman's study of F-test bias for the randomized blocks and Latin square designs employed in agriculture, and some account is given of later statistical developments which sprang from his work—in particular, the classification of model-types and the technique of variance component analysis. It is claimed that there is a need to carry out an examination of F-test bias for experimental designs in education and psychology which will utilize the method and, where appropriate, the known' results of this new branch of variance analysis. In the present paper, such an investigation is carried out for designs which may be regarded as derivatives of the agricultural randomized blocks design. In a paper to follow, a similar investigation will be carried out for experimental designs of the Latin square type.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comment on "A qualification in the use of analysis of variance."Psychological Bulletin, 1952
- On the use of latin squares in psychology.Psychological Bulletin, 1951
- A qualification in the use of analysis of variance.Psychological Bulletin, 1950
- ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS IN THE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCEBiometrika, 1948
- Goodness of fit of trend curves and significance of trend differencesPsychometrika, 1947
- The estimation of reliability when several trials are availablePsychometrika, 1947
- General Solution of the Analysis of Variance and Covariance in the Case of Unequal or Disproportionate Numbers of Observations in the SubclassesPsychometrika, 1946
- ON THE z-TEST IN RANDOMIZED BLOCKS AND LATIN SQUARESBiometrika, 1937
- Statistical Problems in Agricultural ExperimentationJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1935
- The Method of Expected Numbers for Tables of Multiple Classification with Disproportionate Subclass NumbersJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1934