Project D.A.R.E. Outcome Effectiveness Revisited
Top Cited Papers
- 1 June 2004
- journal article
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 94 (6) , 1027-1029
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.94.6.1027
Abstract
Objectives. We provide an updated meta-analysis on the effectiveness of Project D.A.R.E. in preventing alcohol, tobacco, and illicit drug use among school-aged youths. Methods. We used meta-analytic techniques to create an overall effect size for D.A.R.E. outcome evaluations reported in scientific journals. Results. The overall weighted effect size for the included D.A.R.E. studies was extremely small (correlation coefficient = 0.011; Cohen d = 0.023; 95% confidence interval = −0.04, 0.08) and nonsignificant (z = 0.73, NS). Conclusions. Our study supports previous findings indicating that D.A.R.E. is ineffective.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Project DARE: No effects at 10-year follow-up.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1999
- Educators' Perceptions of the D.A.R.E. ProgramJournal of Drug Education, 1997
- How D.A.R.E. Works: An Examination of Program Effects on Mediating VariablesHealth Education & Behavior, 1997
- Effects of Brazelton Demonstrations on Later Parenting: A Meta-AnalysisJournal of Pediatric Psychology, 1996
- Three-Year Follow-Up of Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.)Evaluation Review, 1996
- An Examination of Strategies for Gaining Convergent Validity in Natural ExperimentsEvaluation Review, 1995
- Truth and DARE: Tracking Drug Education to Graduation and as Symbolic PoliticsSocial Problems, 1994
- Reducing the Risk of Drug Involvement Among Early AdolescentsEvaluation Review, 1993
- Impact Evaluation of Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE)Journal of Drug Education, 1992
- Adolescent drug use and psychological health: A longitudinal inquiry.American Psychologist, 1990