Filtering and Brushing with Motion
- 1 March 2002
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Information Visualization
- Vol. 1 (1) , 66-79
- https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500005
Abstract
Visualizing information in user interfaces to complex, large-scale systems is difficult due to visual fragmentation caused by an enormous amount of inter-related data distributed across multiple views. New display dimensions are required to help the user visually integrate and filter such spatially distributed and heterogeneous information. Motion holds promise in this regard as a perceptually efficient display dimension. It has long been known to have a strong grouping effect, suggesting it has potential for filtering and brushing techniques. However, there is little known about which properties of motion are most effective. This paper reviews the prior literature relating to the use of motion for display and discusses the requirements for how motion can be usefully applied to these problems, especially for visualizations incorporating multiple groups of data objects. Results from previous research by the authors suggested motion type was a strong distinguishing feature. Three types of motions in pairwise combinations were compared: linear, circular and expansion/contraction. Combinations of linear directions were also compared to evaluate how great angular separation needs to be to enforce perceptual distinction. The results showed that motion can effectively group objects that are otherwise dissimilar. Type differentiation is more effective than directional differences (except for 90°). Of the three types studied, circular demands the most attention. Angular separation must be 90° to be equally effective. These results suggest that motion can be usefully applied to both filtering and brushing. They also provide the beginnings of a vocabulary of simple motions that can be applied to information visualization.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Inattentional BlindnessPublished by MIT Press ,1998
- The Proximity Compatibility Principle: Its Psychological Foundation and Relevance to Display DesignHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1995
- How in the World Did We Ever Get into That Mode? Mode Error and Awareness in Supervisory ControlHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1995
- The movable filter as a user interface toolPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,1994
- Dynamic queries for information explorationPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,1992
- Search, similarity, and integration of features between and within dimensions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1991
- Brushing ScatterplotsTechnometrics, 1987
- Features and Objects in Visual ProcessingScientific American, 1986
- Generalized fisheye viewsPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,1986
- Preattentive processing in visionComputer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 1985