The Disparity Gradient Limit for Binocular Fusion: An Answer to J D Krol and W A Van de Grind
- 1 October 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perception
- Vol. 11 (5) , 621-624
- https://doi.org/10.1068/p110621
Abstract
The observations reported earlier by the authors are shown to support the view that the constraints for fusion are stimulus-centered and not observer-centered, thus justifying the reformulation of the disparity limits for binocular fusion in terms of a gradient limit which is disputed by Krol and van de Grind.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rehabilitation of a Classical Notion of Panum's Fusional AreaPerception, 1982
- Modifications of the Classical Notion of Panum's Fusional AreaPerception, 1980
- The Double-Nail Illusion: Experiments on Binocular Vision with Nails, Needles, and PinsPerception, 1980
- A Disparity Gradient Limit for Binocular FusionScience, 1980
- Binocular single vision and perceptual processingProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1979
- Geometry of binocular vision and a model for stereopsisBiological Cybernetics, 1976
- Stereoscopic Vision: Cortical Limitations and a Disparity Scaling EffectScience, 1973
- Extension of Panum’s Fusional Area in Binocularly Stabilized Vision*Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1967