Some Contrasts Between Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis and Alpha Factor Analysis
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Applied Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 14 (1) , 29-32
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169001400103
Abstract
The fundamental mathematical model of Thurstone’s common factor analysis is reviewed. The basic covariance matrices of maximum likelihood factor analysis (MLFA) and alpha factor analysis (AFA) are presented. Putting aside the principles on which they are based, these two methods are compared in terms of a number of computational and scaling contrasts following from the application of their respective developments. The paper concludes with a discussion of the number-of-factors problem, the weighting problem in MLFA and AFA, and possible bases for a choice between the two. Index terms: alpha factor analysis, common factor analysis, maximum likelihood factor analysis, number of common factors, scaling and weighting in common factor analysisKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Loss Function for Alpha Factor AnalysisPsychometrika, 1984
- A General Computing Algorithm for Factor AnalysisBiometrical Journal, 1979
- A Computational Starting Point for Rao's Canonical Factor Analysis: Implications for Computerized ProceduresEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1974
- Alpha-Maximized Factor Analysis (Alphamax): Its Relation to Alpha and Canonical Factor AnalysisPsychometrika, 1968
- Neue Iterationsverfahren in der FaktorenanalyseBiometrische Zeitschrift, 1968
- Alpha Factor Analysis of Infallible VariablesPsychometrika, 1966
- The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor AnalysisEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960
- The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysisPsychometrika, 1958
- Multiple Rectilinear Prediction and the Resolution into ComponentsPsychometrika, 1940
- Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1933