Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Lumbar Spine -- Terrific Test or Tar Baby?
- 14 July 1994
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 331 (2) , 115-116
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199407143310209
Abstract
Back pain affects nearly half of all adults during a given year, and about two thirds of adults have back pain at some time in their lives. It is the second leading reason for visits to physicians in the United States and the leading cause of work-related disability1. Unfortunately, the cause of back problems is often obscure, in part because symptoms, anatomical findings, and imaging results may be only loosely associated. Thus, up to 85 percent of patients with low back pain cannot be given a definitive diagnosis2. This diagnostic uncertainty contributes to the large number of fads . . .Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Lumbar Spine in People without Back PainNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Delayed Postoperative Paraplegia with Hypotension in Adult Revision Scoliosis SurgerySpine, 1994
- Advances in Diagnostic Imaging and Overestimations of Disease Prevalence and the Benefits of TherapyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Fads in the Treatment of Low Back PainNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Elective discectomy for herniation of a lumbar disc. Additional experience with an objective method.Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1990
- Uncle remus and the cascade effect in clinical medicine: Brer rabbit kicks the tar-babyThe American Journal of Medicine, 1987
- A Concept of Illness Tested as an Improved Basis for Surgical Decisions in Low-Back DisordersSpine, 1986
- The Cascade Effect in the Clinical Care of PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Synopsis: Workshop on Idiopathic Low-Back PainSpine, 1982
- Increased Absenteeism from Work after Detection and Labeling of Hypertensive PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978