Radical Prostatectomy for High Grade Disease: A Reevaluation 1994
- 1 June 1994
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 151 (6) , 1583-1586
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35308-9
Abstract
Traditionally, patients with high grade tumors (Gleason score 8 to 10) were not considered candidates for radical prostatectomy because of poor long-term survival rate. However, with improvements in the staging of prostate cancer and a reduction in the morbidity of radical prostatectomy, it is reasonable to reevaluate the results of radical prostatectomy in high grade disease in a contemporary setting. We studied the clinical outcome of 72 men with Gleason scores 8 to 10 on needle biopsy who presented with clinically localized disease (T1c [9], T2a [22], T2b [17], T2c [13] and T3a [11]). Nine patients (13%) did not undergo radical prostatectomy because of positive lymph nodes identified on frozen section. Of the 63 men who underwent radical prostatectomy 43 (68%) had negative lymph nodes and 20 (32%) had positive lymph nodes. The actuarial likelihood of having an undetectable serum prostate specific antigen at 5 years was 43% for men with negative lymph nodes and 45% for men with specimen confined disease. In 7 men (9%) distant metastases developed and all had positive lymph nodes at surgery. These data suggest that men with high grade disease who are suitable candidates for radical prostatectomy should have the pelvic lymph nodes evaluated. If the lymph nodes are negative, the patient may benefit from an attempt at surgical cure.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prostatic adenocarcinoma: Reproducibility and correlation with clinical stages of four grading systemsHuman Pathology, 1988
- Natural History and Staging of Prostate CancerUrologic Clinics of North America, 1984
- The Accuracy of Diagnostic Biopsy Specimens in Predicting Tumor Grades by Gleason’s Classification of Radical Prostatectomy SpecimensJournal of Urology, 1984
- Evaluation of gleason classification system in prostate cancerUrology, 1983
- Understaging and undergrading of prostate cancer Argument for postoperative radiation as adjuvant therapyUrology, 1983
- Evaluation of histological grading (Gleason) in carcinoma of the prostate: Adverse influence of highest gradeThe Prostate, 1983
- Grading Errors in Prostatic Needle Biopsies: Relation to the Accuracy of Tumor Grade in Predicting Pelvic Lymph Node MetastasesJournal of Urology, 1982
- Bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma of prostate with regional lymph node involvementUrology, 1982
- The Prognostic Role of Lymphadenectomy in Adenocarcinoma of the ProstateUrologic Clinics of North America, 1980
- The Palpable Nodule of Prostatic CancerPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1968