Competitive antagonists discriminate between NK2 tachykinin receptor subtypes
Open Access
- 19 July 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Pharmacology
- Vol. 100 (3) , 588-592
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1990.tb15851.x
Abstract
1 We have compared the ability of various tachykinins and selective tachykinin receptor agonists to induce contraction of the endothelium-denuded rabbit pulmonary artery (RPA) and hamster trachea (HT) and have estimated the affinity of some newly developed NK2 selective antagonists in the same tissues. 2 In confirmation of previous findings, experiments with the agonists indicated that NK2 receptors are the main if not the sole mediators of the response to tachykinins in both RPA and HT. No evidence for significant degradation of neurokinin A (NKA) was found in either tissue when experiments were repeated in the presence of a mixture of peptidase inhibitors (thiorphan, captopril and bestatin, 1 μm each). 3 The peptide antagonists tested were: Peptide I = [Tyr5, d-Trp6,8,9, Arg10]-NKA(4–10); Peptide II = [Tyr5, d-Trp6,8,9, Arg10]-NKA(3–10); Peptide III = Ac-Leu-Asp-Gln-Trp-Phe-Gly-NH2. The three peptides produced a concentration-dependent rightward shift of the concentration-response curve to NKA in both RPA and HT with no significant depression of the maximal response attainable. The slopes of the Schild plots were not significantly different from unity, indicating a competitive antagonism. Peptides I and II were about 100 times more potent in the RPA than in the HT, while Peptide III was about 100 times more potent in the HT than RPA. 4 The pA2 values obtained in these two tissues with the three antagonists were not significantly different when tested in the absence or presence of peptidase inhibitors, or when a selective NK2 receptor agonist, [βAla8]-NKA(4–10) was used instead of NKA. Similar pA2 values were obtained after 15 or 90 min of incubation with the antagonists. Peptides I, II and III had no inhibitory effect on contractions produced by noradrenaline in the RPA or by carbachol in the HT. 5 Peptides I, II and III showed weak or no antagonistic activity toward the vasodilatator effect of substance P in the dog carotid artery (NK1 receptor-mediated) or toward the contractile effect of neurokinin B in the rat portal vein (NK3 receptor-mediated). 6 These results provide pharmacological evidence for heterogeneity of NK2 receptors in the RPA and HT. The NK2 receptors present in these tissues are not discriminated by natural tachykinins or selective agonists, but are recognized with very different affinity by NK2 receptor antagonists.This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Further studies on the motor response of the human isolated urinary bladder to tachykinins, capsaicin and electrical field stimulationGeneral Pharmacology: The Vascular System, 1989
- New selective agonists for neurokinin receptors: pharmacological tools for receptor characterizationTrends in Pharmacological Sciences, 1988
- Agonist and antagonist binding to tachykinin peptide NK-2 receptorsLife Sciences, 1988
- Contractile response of the human isolated urinary bladder to neurokinins: involvement of NK-2 receptorsEuropean Journal of Pharmacology, 1988
- Characterization of neurokinin receptors in various isolated organs by the use of selective agonistsLife Sciences, 1987
- Peripheral effects of neurokinins: functional evidence for the existence of multiple receptorsJournal of Autonomic Pharmacology, 1987
- Pharmacological receptors for substance P and neurokininsLife Sciences, 1987
- “Kassinin” in mammals: The newest tachykininsPeptides, 1985
- Novel Pharmacology of Substance K-Binding Sites: a Third Type of Tachykinin ReceptorScience, 1984
- pA2 and receptor differentiation: A statistical analysis of competitive antagonismLife Sciences, 1979