The Trouble with "Articulatory" Pauses
- 1 July 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Language and Speech
- Vol. 26 (3) , 203-214
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098302600302
Abstract
The historical provenance of a minimum cut-off point (of about 0.25 sec) for pauses in temporal analyses of speech production is associated with Goldman-Eisler's usage. Her rationale was the predominance of articulatory pauses at lengths shorter than 0.25 sec. Both phonotactic facts and empirical analysis of several corpora of readings disconfirm this predominance with respect to pauses 0.13-0.25 sec in length. The vast majority of these pauses are found to be psychological; they are determined by syntax, punctuation, rhetorical and expressive emphasis, poetic format, and stylistic pecularities.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Temporal Model of Speech ProductionPhonetica, 1981
- Temporal Variables in SpeechPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1980
- Analyse contrastive des variables temporelles de l’anglais et du français: vitesse de parole et variables composantes, phénomènes d’hésitationPhonetica, 1975
- Artifacts in the Registration and Interpretation of Speech-Process VariablesLanguage and Speech, 1975
- The effects of task difficulty and anxiety on hesitations in speech.Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 1969
- On the Statistics of Spoken EnglishThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1963
- Speech Production and the Predictability of Words in ContextQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1958
- Acoustic Properties of Stop ConsonantsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1957
- An Experimental Study of Pause in English GrammarAmerican Speech, 1948
- Relativ Frequency of English Speech SoundsPublished by Harvard University Press ,1923