Analysis of Clinical Stage T2 Prostate Cancer: Do Current Subclassifications Represent an Improvement?
- 15 April 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 20 (8) , 2025-2030
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2002.08.123
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the extent of palpable cancer within the prostate predicts outcome after radical prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We combined prospectively collected data on 1,755 consecutive clinical stage T2 patients treated with radical prostatectomy alone at four institutions. According to the 1992 American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis system, 645 (37%) were T2a, 758 (43%) were T2b, and 352 (20%) were T2c. Kaplan-Meier and proportional hazards regression analyses were performed on the 1992 and 1997 T2 subclassifications. After controlling for the effects of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and biopsy Gleason sum, the two staging systems were compared for their ability to predict recurrence-free survival (RFS). Adjusted RFS curves were constructed using the corrected group prognosis method. RESULTS: Follow-up ranged from 1 to 166 months (median, 26 months). Cancer recurred in 417 (24%) of the T2 patients. The 1992 (P = .005) but not the 1997 (P = .100) T2 subclassification predicted outcome after controlling for PSA and Gleason sum. After covariate adjustment, RFS was 7% higher at 5 years in the 1992 T2a subcategory relative to the T2b subcategory. CONCLUSION: The 1992 American Joint Committee on Cancer system is superior to the 1997 system, and the former adds prognostic information to a model containing pretreatment PSA and Gleason sum. These results suggest that 1992 T2 subclassification derived from palpable findings improves prognostication over the 1997 subclassification.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparing tumour staging and grading systems: a case study and a review of the issues, using thymoma as a modelStatistics in Medicine, 2000
- LONG-TERM HAZARD OF PROGRESSION AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER: CONTINUED RISK OF BIOCHEMICAL FAILURE AFTER 5 YEARSJournal of Urology, 2000
- ABILITY OF THE 1992 AND 1997 AMERICAN JOINT COMMITTEE ON CANCER STAGING SYSTEMS FOR PROSTATE CANCER TO PREDICT PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR STAGE T2 DISEASEJournal of Urology, 2000
- Outcome evaluation of the 1997 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for prostate carcinoma treated by radiation therapyCancer, 1999
- CLASSIFICATION OF LOCALIZED UNTREATED PROSTATE CANCER BASED ON 791 MEN TREATED ONLY WITH RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: COMMON GROUND FOR THERAPEUTIC TRIALS AND TNM SUBGROUPSJournal of Urology, 1998
- A Preoperative Nomogram for Disease Recurrence Following Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1998
- Hazard rates for progression after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancerUrology, 1997
- Combination of Prostate-Specific Antigen, Clinical Stage, and Gleason Score to Predict Pathological Stage of Localized Prostate CancerJAMA, 1997
- Interexaminer variability of digital rectal examination in detecting prostate cancerUrology, 1995
- Hormone therapy in prostatic cancerThe American Journal of Medicine, 1956