The Medical Dialogue: Disentangling Differences between Hispanic and non-Hispanic Whites
Open Access
- 20 September 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 22 (11) , 1538-1543
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0368-0
Abstract
Patients’ race and ethnicity play an important role in quality of and access to healthcare in the United States. To examine the influence of ethnicity – Hispanic whites vs. non-Hispanic whites – on respondents’ self-reported interactions with healthcare providers. To understand, among Hispanic whites, how demographic and socioeconomic characteristics impact their interactions with healthcare providers. Cross-sectional analysis of the 2002 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, a nationally representative survey on medical care conducted by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Civilian, noninstitutionalized U.S. population aged ≥18 years who reported visiting a healthcare provider within the past 12 months prior to data collection. After controlling for several demographic and socioeconomic covariates, compared to non-Hispanic whites (reference group), Hispanic whites who had visited a doctor’s office or clinic in the past 12 months were more likely to report that their healthcare provider “always” listened to them [odds ratio (OR) = 1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21–1.53], explained things so that they understood (OR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.10–1.41), showed respect for what they had to say (OR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.35–1.72), and spent enough time with them (OR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.08–1.38). However, Hispanics were less likely to indicate that their health care provider “always” gave them control over treatment options (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.72–0.95) as compared to non-Hispanics. Within the Hispanic population exclusively, age, place of residence, census region, health insurance status, and presence of a usual source of care influenced self-reported interactions with healthcare providers. Hispanic white respondents were more likely to report that some aspects of provider–patient interactions were indicative of high quality, whereas those related to decision-making autonomy were not. These somewhat paradoxical results should be examined more fully in future research.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differences in Self-Reported Health Among Asians, Latinos, and Non-Hispanic Whites: The Role of Language and NativityAnnals of Epidemiology, 2007
- What are the key attributes of primary care for patients? Building a conceptual ‘map’ of patient preferencesHealth Expectations, 2006
- Patient Participation in Medical ConsultationsMedical Care, 2005
- Not all patients want to participate in decision makingJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2005
- Patients' Beliefs About Racism, Preferences for Physician Race, and Satisfaction With CareAnnals of Family Medicine, 2005
- Variation in participation in health care settings associated with race and ethnicityJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2004
- Patient–Physician Relationships and Racial Disparities in the Quality of Health CareAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2003
- The Contribution of Insurance Coverage and Community Resources to Reducing Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Access to CareHealth Services Research, 2003
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Perceptions of Physician Style and TrustArchives of Family Medicine, 2000
- Do Patients Choose Physicians Of Their Own Race?Health Affairs, 2000