Percutaneous radiologic and endoscopic gastrostomy: a 3-year institutional analysis of procedure performance.
- 1 December 1997
- journal article
- Published by American Roentgen Ray Society in American Journal of Roentgenology
- Vol. 169 (6) , 1551-1553
- https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.169.6.9393163
Abstract
The study was designed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and usefulness of the performance of percutaneous radiologic (PRG) and endoscopic (PEG) gastrostomy.This study involved a retrospective review of 182 percutaneous gastrostomy procedures (68 PRG, 114 PEG) performed over a 3-year period. Parameters analyzed included technical success, procedure duration, anesthetic requirements, incidental findings on endoscopy, and complications.The success rate for tube placement was higher for PRG than for PEG (100% versus 95%). PRG was subsequently performed in four of six patients in whom PEG procedures failed. Mean procedure duration was shorter for PRG than for PEG (32.9 min versus 39.1 min, p < .05). PRG was performed without conscious sedation (i.e., local anesthesia only) more frequently than was PEG (25% versus 0%, p < .001). The mean volume of doses of midazolam hydrochloride administered during PRG was two thirds of the volume of doses used during PEG. Incidental abnormalities were detected in 32 (30%) of...Keywords
This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: