Management of Benign Ureteral Strictures: Open Surgical Repair or Endoscopic Dilation?
- 1 February 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 141 (2) , 285-286
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40742-7
Abstract
We reviewed 20 cases of ureteral strictures, 15 of which were secondary to ureteral trauma. Of the patients 6 were managed initially by open repair and 14 underwent endoscopic manipulation. All 6 open repairs were successful, compared to 9 to the 14 patients who underwent endoscopic dilation of the ureteral stricture. Of the 5 failures 3 were due to the inability to cannulate the strictured ureter with a guide wire and 2 failed to respond to balloon dilation. Of these 5 patients 4 were treated successfully by an open operation. There were no serious intraoperative or postoperative complications. The average hospitalization was less for the endoscopic group (2.1 days) compared to the open surgical group (8.3 days). Follow-up ranged from 6 to 48 months.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ureteral Perforation During Ureterorenoscopy: Treatment and ManagementJournal of Urology, 1987
- Percutaneous Management of Benign Ureteral Strictures and FistulasJournal of Urology, 1987
- Management of Ureteroscopic InjuriesJournal of Urology, 1987
- Endourological Management of Ureteroileal Anastomotic Strictures: Is It Effective?Journal of Urology, 1987
- Percutaneous Surgery for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction (Endopyelotomy): Technique and Early ResultsJournal of Urology, 1986
- Antegrade ureteral stenting for dehiscence, strictures, and fistulaeAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1984
- Catheter dilatation of benign ureteral strictures.Radiology, 1983
- Experimental Ureteral Stricture: Ureteral Regrowth Following Ureterotomy with and Without IntubationJournal of Urology, 1960
- Intubated UreterotomyJournal of Urology, 1951