Lord's Procedure-the Best Operation for Hydrocele?
- 1 August 1991
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Urology
- Vol. 68 (2) , 187-189
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1991.tb15292.x
Abstract
A prospective study was carried out to compare Lord's hydrocele operation with traditional surgical procedures. The groups of patients investigated were comparable in terms of age, period of observation, number of previous aspirations and size of hydrocele. The incidence of isolated hydrocele of the spermatic cord, as well as epididymal cysts, was lower in the patients who underwent Lord's procedure (7.2 versus 15.8%), as was the percentage of patients reporting post-operative pain for more than 3 days (4.3 versus 15.8%, p less than 0.05).Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Die Hydrozelenoperation nach LordAktuelle Urologie, 1988
- Technique and Results of Trans‐scrotal Operations for Hydrocele and Scrotal CystsBritish Journal of Urology, 1986
- Operative treatment of hydrocele another look at lord's procedureUrology, 1978
- An operation for large scrotal hydroceleBritish Journal of Surgery, 1973
- Lord's Operation for Hydrocele Compared With Conventional TechniquesArchives of Surgery, 1972
- Bloodless Surgical Procedures for the Cure of Idiopathic Hydrocoele and Epididymal Cyst (Spermatocoele)Published by S. Karger AG ,1971
- A bloodless operation for the radical cure of idiopathic hydroceleBritish Journal of Surgery, 1964