Meta-analysis of effects and side effects of low dosage tricyclic antidepressants in depression: systematic review
- 2 November 2002
- Vol. 325 (7371) , 991
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7371.991
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effects and side effects of low dosage tricyclic antidepressants with placebo and with standard dosage tricyclics in acute phase treatment of depression. Design: Systematic review of randomised trials comparing low dosage tricyclics (100 mg/day) with placebo or with standard dosage tricyclics in adults with depression. Main outcome measures: Relative risk of response in depression (random effects model), according to the original authors' definition but usually defined as 50% or greater reduction in severity of depression. Relative risks of overall dropouts and dropouts due to side effects. Results: 35 studies (2013 participants) compared low dosage tricyclics with placebo, and six studies (551 participants) compared low dosage tricyclics with standard dosage tricyclics. Low dosage tricyclics, mostly between 75 and 100 mg/day, were 1.65 (95% confidence interval 1.36 to 2.0) and 1.47 (1.12 to 1.94) times more likely than placebo to bring about response at 4 weeks and 6-8 weeks, respectively. Standard dosage tricyclics failed, however, to bring about more response but produced more dropouts due to side effects than low dosage tricyclics. Conclusions: Treatment of depression in adults with low dose tricyclics is justified. However, more rigorous studies are needed to definitively establish the relative benefits and harms of various dosages. What is already known on this topic Tricyclics are still prescribed as often as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and other newer antidepressants worldwide Experts have often claimed that clinicians prescribe tricyclics at less than adequate dosages What this study adds Tricyclics at dosages below the recommended range are more effective than placebo They may or may not be as effective as standard dosage tricyclics but result in fewer dropouts due to side effects The minimum effective dosage and ranges for antidepressants has not been established—a simple set of numbers that every practising doctor and patient would want to knowKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can we individualize the ‘number needed to treat’? An empirical study of summary effect measures in meta-analysesInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2002
- Antidepressant Prescribing to Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White Patients in Primary CareAnnals of Pharmacotherapy, 2001
- Growth and change in the prescribing of anti-depressants in New Zealand: 1993-1997.2001
- Treatment received by depressed patients in Japan and its determinants: naturalistic observation from a multi-center collaborative follow-up studyJournal of Affective Disorders, 2000
- Suboptimal Use of Antidepressants in the Treatment of DepressionCNS Drugs, 2000
- Evidence-based guidelines for treating depressive disorders with antidepressants: a revision of the 1993 British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelinesJournal of Psychopharmacology, 2000
- Prescribing Trends in Psychotropic MedicationsJAMA, 1998
- Recognition and management of depression in general practice: consensus statement.BMJ, 1992
- Reporting on Methods in Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982